<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>eric.blog &#187; Reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ethiessen.com/tag/reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ethiessen.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:32:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Dark Knight &#8211; A</title>
		<link>http://ethiessen.com/2008/07/19/the-dark-knight-a/</link>
		<comments>http://ethiessen.com/2008/07/19/the-dark-knight-a/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 11:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethiessen.com/?p=96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
No spoilers!
One word review: Wowza.
Definitely lived up to the hype, and surpassed even my very high expectations. Haha, I&#8217;ve already seen it twice tonight, and have plans to see it in theatres at least once more this weekend. And then I&#8217;ll probably see it again, in IMAX this time, sometime in the coming week.
It really [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://ethiessen.com/blog/images/movies/dark knight.jpg" alt="Dark Knight" /></p>
<p>No spoilers!</p>
<p>One word review: Wowza.</p>
<p>Definitely lived up to the hype, and surpassed even my very high expectations. Haha, I&#8217;ve already seen it twice tonight, and have plans to see it in theatres at least once more this weekend. And then I&#8217;ll probably see it again, in IMAX this time, sometime in the coming week.</p>
<p>It really is that good. (Plus I&#8217;m a huge nerd, haha). So ya, I give it an &#8220;A&#8221; ranking (not quite the rare &#8220;A+&#8221;, due to my minor issues &#8211; see below eventually). But best superhero movie ever, no contest.</p>
<p><span id="more-96"></span></p>
<p>Once again, Bale is incredible in his role. Definitely one of my favourite actors. He&#8217;s great both as Batman &#8211; dark, violent, yet maintaining control of those inner demons &#8211; and as Bruce Wayne &#8211; alternately douchebag playboy and noble, struggling hero. I really like how the jerk version of Wayne was done. I won&#8217;t spoil anything, but ya, highly amusing.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.wired.com/underwire/">Underwire</a> described Ledger&#8217;s version of The Joker as &#8220;the most exciting movie villain of the decade&#8221;, and I fully agree. He&#8217;ll probably get a posthumous Oscar nod for this role. I certainly think he deserves it. One of the most perfect examples of acting I&#8217;ve ever seen, he literally <em>becomes</em> the character. It was disturbing, almost terrifying at points, and yet wonderfully <em>villainous. </em>And the hero/villan dichotomy (what is one without the other?) was also extremely well-played.</p>
<p>But I had a few beefs with this movie. Firstly, the facial CGI. You&#8217;ll see what I mean. Even really good computer imagery can still look obviously fake, I would have prefered make-up &#8211; less disturbing, but more realistic. And secondly, how Gyllenhaal&#8217;s character, Rachel, was supposed to be the same person as Holmes from <em>Batman Begins</em>. I realize that Holmes kinda screwed them over by declining the project, but still, I would&#8217;ve rather they written Rachel out of the story and introduced a new leading lady. But I guess this would have ruined the plot arc. Still, it just annoys me whenever actor-switches happen to characters.</p>
<p>Plus I find Katie Holmes to be way more attractive than Maggie Gyllenhaal, heh, so I missed her absence. But I really do think Holmes was the perfect casting choice for the role, and I wish she&#8217;d have seen it all the way through.</p>
<p>Some of Batman&#8217;s abilities/technologies were a bit too <em>deux ex machina</em>, as awesome as they were. But hey, I guess comic books are all about the hero&#8217;s powers being exactly what&#8217;s required for the given scenario, so I really shouldn&#8217;t complain. It&#8217;s just because <em>Dark Knight</em> rose so far above the &#8220;comic book movie&#8221;, to become a genuine crime drama, that such things became really noticeable. This is a movie rising above it&#8217;s genre to become something on a whole higher level.</p>
<p>Caine was, once again, an absolutely perfect Alfred. Freeman just seems way too obvious for anything he does, he&#8217;s so over-used, but still, he&#8217;s good.</p>
<p>There were genuinely-surprising plot twists and random moments throughout that really impressed me, such as a great example of Prisoner&#8217;s Dilemma that I was totally expecting to go one way, but instead went another.</p>
<p>Anyhow, you&#8217;re going to go see it yourself, because everybody is, so I won&#8217;t even bother trying to summarize everything <em>and</em> keep it spoiler-free at this point. Maybe in a week or so I&#8217;ll write more of my thoughts, including hopefully a review of the IMAX experience.</p>
<p>In the meantime, do yourself a favour and check out <em>Dark Knight. </em>You will not be disappointed.</p>
<p><span style="font-style: italic; font-size: 10px; color: #999999;"><a title="Hans Zimmer and James Newton Howard - Eptesicus">(instrumental)</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ethiessen.com/2008/07/19/the-dark-knight-a/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
